FiftyBidsGovernment contracts and grants, sent to your inbox.

Back to search

Notice

RFI: Draft MIL-DTL for Militarized USB-C (USB-CM) - Feedback Request

The Program Manager – Protection and Integration (PM-PI) is seeking feedback on draft #2 of Military Detail document aka MIL-DTL for a new design for military connections.

Notice typeSpecial Notice: An announcement, such as an industry day or a request for information.
Who's buyingW6qk Acc-Apg Natick, Dept of the Army
WhereWork location not listed. The buying office is in Natick, Massachusetts.
DeadlineFri, Nov 6, 2026 at 7:00 PM EST (14 days left)
Who can bidOpen to any business (no set-aside listed)
IndustryNAICS 334417 (Electronic Connector Manufacturing)
PostedWed, Oct 7, 2026
ContactDanny Soto, [email protected]

Open the official posting

From the notice

THIS IS A REQUEST FOR INFORMATION (RFI) ONLY. This is not a Request for Quotation (RFQ), Request for Proposal (RFP) or an Invitation for Bid (IFB). The Program Manager – Protection and Integration (PM-PI) is seeking feedback on draft #2 of Military Detail document aka MIL-DTL for a new design for military connections. This draft incorporated comments from draft #1 and is subject to change based on relevant feedback and other developmental milestones of the program. Militarized USB-C aka “USB-CM” is an environmentally hardened connection built to survive military environments. The connector supports power and data requirements and supports USB standards unless specifically stated otherwise. This government owned design is intended to provide a standard interface for military equipment and is not proprietary. USB-CM is intended to provide a reliable and ruggedized standard connector for users across the Department of War in their deployed terrestrial, maritime: surface and sub-surface, air, and space operational environment(s). PM-PI is looking for public feedback on the second draft of MIL-DTL document including, but not limited to: USB-CM connector design, manufacturability, ability to integrate into vendor products, cost considerations, any perceived limitations of use, durability and corrosion resistance, materials, etc. It is encouraged that comments include tradeoffs in metrics, such as cost/data/design/testing as it relates to data rate and power levels. This is a refine

We may have shortened this. The official posting is the record. We are not affiliated with the agency that published it.